“SEO isn’t good for users” and “It’s a bug that you could rank highly in Google without buying ads, and Google is trying to fix the bug” are two quotes from a Google employee that go directly against things Google’s said before. The real truth emerging? More like a new Google employee who doesn’t seem to know much about his company.

The employee is Jonathan Rockway. Google confirms he’s a new Googler — or Noogler — as new employees are known. He started in early January. Google didn’t explain what his job is, but he doesn’t appear to be involved in Google’s web search listings process.

SEO Isn’t Good?

That didn’t prevent Rockway from making comments about SEO and ads in a discussion on the Hacker News web site. While sticking up for his new employer, and its move to bring more social content and signals into its search results, Rockway said:

If the social features are relevant, though, then users are getting a better experience. And that’s a good thing, even if individual pages get less traffic from Google. Instead of being able to SEO the entire Internet, businesses can now only affect the search results for a tiny percentage of users. That’s a good thing because SEO can’t scale, and SEO isn’t good for users or the Internet at large.

I’ve bolded the key part. SEO isn’t good for users? As you’d expect, that’s got the attention of some SEOs. Aaron Wall highlighted Rockway’s comments on his SEO Book blog. So did Barry Schwartz on Search Engine Roundtable. I’ve also see references to Rockway’s comments making the rounds on social media channels I follow.

Google Says: SEO Isn’t Spam

Google’s official stance is that SEO isn’t bad. The company has repeatedly said this over time. In fact, last October, the head of Google’s web spam team, Matt Cutts, did an entire video on how Google doesn’t see SEO as spam. You can watch for yourself:

Google confirmed to me today that the video above “accurately protrays Google’s position” on SEO, rather than what Rockway said.

Ads For Ranking Well?

Perhaps more worrisome, however, was Rockway’s comments about ads. He said:

If you look at the Google experience from the standpoint of customers, it’s pretty good. Users get relevant search results and ads. Advertisers get their content on top of everything else. It’s a good compromise between advertising and usability, and it works really well. It’s a bug that you could rank highly in Google without buying ads, and Google is trying to fix the bug. Manipulating Google results shouldn’t be something you feel entitled to be able to do. If you want to rank highly in Google, be relevant for the user currently searching. Engage him in social media or email, provide relevant information about what you’re selling, and, generally, be a “good match” for what the user wants.

Again, I’ve bolded the key part. That comment suggests that Google is working to change things so that if you want to rank well on Google, you need to be buying ads. That’s pretty loaded stuff.

It’s also not something that seems reasonable. Yes, perhaps this new employee managed to slip-up about the grand master plan. Far more likely, he simply doesn’t know what he’s talking about.

Ads Don’t Matter

Three days after his original comment, Rockway made a 180 degree turn:

I shouldn’t have mentioned ads here. Position on the results page should only depend on the quality of your content; if your site has the best content on the Internet for the user’s search terms, you should be the top result. You shouldn’t be able to change your position in the organic results any other way, like by exploiting bugs in Google’s ranking algorithm. The specifics of the ranking algorithm may change, but if your site is the best, you won’t have to worry about it.

That took care of the ads issue; it still left SEO looking like some type of exploit.

For the record, Google told me this:

As always, Google search rankings are completely unrelated to Google’s paid advertising services and other partnerships, and there is absolutely no way for a webmaster to pay money to increase search rankings.

When it comes to SEO, many owners of high-quality sites can and do get their site listed well in Google’s search results without any outside help. Some site owners prefer to have someone else check and optimize their sites, and for these folks we’ve published some guidelines relating to evaluating SEO companies.

Overall, I’d agree with Cutts, who commented on Twitter that it’s nice to see more Googlers communicating. But I’d say I want that communication from Googlers who actually know what they’re talking about. That didn’t seem to be the case here.

Related Topics: Features: Analysis

About The Author: Danny Sullivan is editor-in-chief of Search Engine Land. He’s a widely cited authority on search engines and search marketing issues who has covered the space since 1996. Danny also oversees Search Engine Land’s SMX: Search Marketing Expo conference series. He maintains a personal blog called Daggle (and maintains his disclosures page there). He can be found on Facebook, Google + and microblogs on Twitter as @dannysullivan. See more articles by Danny Sullivan

“SEO isn’t good for users” and “It’s a bug that you could rank highly in Google without buying ads, and Google is trying to fix the bug” are two quotes from a Google employee that go directly against things Google’s said before. The real truth emerging? More like a new Google employee who doesn’t seem to know much about his company.

The employee is Jonathan Rockway. Google confirms he’s a new Googler — or Noogler — as new employees are known. He started in early January. Google didn’t explain what his job is, but he doesn’t appear to be involved in Google’s web search listings process.

SEO Isn’t Good?

That didn’t prevent Rockway from making comments about SEO and ads in a discussion on the Hacker News web site. While sticking up for his new employer, and its move to bring more social content and signals into its search results, Rockway said:

If the social features are relevant, though, then users are getting a better experience. And that’s a good thing, even if individual pages get less traffic from Google. Instead of being able to SEO the entire Internet, businesses can now only affect the search results for a tiny percentage of users. That’s a good thing because SEO can’t scale, and SEO isn’t good for users or the Internet at large.

I’ve bolded the key part. SEO isn’t good for users? As you’d expect, that’s got the attention of some SEOs. Aaron Wall highlighted Rockway’s comments on his SEO Book blog. So did Barry Schwartz on Search Engine Roundtable. I’ve also see references to Rockway’s comments making the rounds on social media channels I follow.

Google Says: SEO Isn’t Spam

Google’s official stance is that SEO isn’t bad. The company has repeatedly said this over time. In fact, last October, the head of Google’s web spam team, Matt Cutts, did an entire video on how Google doesn’t see SEO as spam. You can watch for yourself:

Google confirmed to me today that the video above “accurately protrays Google’s position” on SEO, rather than what Rockway said.

Ads For Ranking Well?

Perhaps more worrisome, however, was Rockway’s comments about ads. He said:

If you look at the Google experience from the standpoint of customers, it’s pretty good. Users get relevant search results and ads. Advertisers get their content on top of everything else. It’s a good compromise between advertising and usability, and it works really well. It’s a bug that you could rank highly in Google without buying ads, and Google is trying to fix the bug. Manipulating Google results shouldn’t be something you feel entitled to be able to do. If you want to rank highly in Google, be relevant for the user currently searching. Engage him in social media or email, provide relevant information about what you’re selling, and, generally, be a “good match” for what the user wants.

Again, I’ve bolded the key part. That comment suggests that Google is working to change things so that if you want to rank well on Google, you need to be buying ads. That’s pretty loaded stuff.

It’s also not something that seems reasonable. Yes, perhaps this new employee managed to slip-up about the grand master plan. Far more likely, he simply doesn’t know what he’s talking about.

Ads Don’t Matter

Three days after his original comment, Rockway made a 180 degree turn:

I shouldn’t have mentioned ads here. Position on the results page should only depend on the quality of your content; if your site has the best content on the Internet for the user’s search terms, you should be the top result. You shouldn’t be able to change your position in the organic results any other way, like by exploiting bugs in Google’s ranking algorithm. The specifics of the ranking algorithm may change, but if your site is the best, you won’t have to worry about it.

That took care of the ads issue; it still left SEO looking like some type of exploit.

For the record, Google told me this:

As always, Google search rankings are completely unrelated to Google’s paid advertising services and other partnerships, and there is absolutely no way for a webmaster to pay money to increase search rankings.

When it comes to SEO, many owners of high-quality sites can and do get their site listed well in Google’s search results without any outside help. Some site owners prefer to have someone else check and optimize their sites, and for these folks we’ve published some guidelines relating to evaluating SEO companies.

Overall, I’d agree with Cutts, who commented on Twitter that it’s nice to see more Googlers communicating. But I’d say I want that communication from Googlers who actually know what they’re talking about. That didn’t seem to be the case here.

Related Topics: Features: Analysis

About The Author: Danny Sullivan is editor-in-chief of Search Engine Land. He’s a widely cited authority on search engines and search marketing issues who has covered the space since 1996. Danny also oversees Search Engine Land’s SMX: Search Marketing Expo conference series. He maintains a personal blog called Daggle (and maintains his disclosures page there). He can be found on Facebook, Google + and microblogs on Twitter as @dannysullivan. See more articles by Danny Sullivan

Introduction

Yes, it’s important to stay on top of best practices for website design and function, but it’s also vital to keep up to date with how you drive visitors to your site. With constant changes in the search world, it can seem tiresome to know how to get the most out of your search engine optimization (SEO) tactics. 

Take note of the most recent SEO shifts that are crucial for marketers to know.

Google makes significant algorithm updates

Making algorithm updates is nothing new for search giant Google, but their latest update, “freshness,” will impact 35 percent of online searches. This new algorithm will ensure that recent content is at the top of search results. Google is aware that not every search query is best with the “freshness update.” For instance, a chocolate chip cookie recipe that was posted nearly ten years ago is still served as one of the top results, because of its popularity — with more than 5,000 reviews and thousands of “saves,” Google knows that this recipe is what people are looking for.

However, when searching for current events and topics, Google serves up the most recent content to those searching timely information. To witness how the “freshness” update works, observe the search results below for the newly released film, “My Week with Marilyn.” The results mimic a timeline — the top results consist of the latest content followed by more dated material.

So how does Google’s “freshness” update benefit marketers? It gives them the opportunity to place well in search results by developing relevant and creative content. The “freshness” update should encourage brands and businesses to display timely news on their website — easy ways to do this are by blogging more frequently by and posting press releases to a news page.

As search and social become ever more entwined in Google’s and Bing’s algorithms and search results, search engine optimizers cannot afford to turn a blind eye to social media. Bing incorporates Facebook data into its search results. Google has taken another big step with the introduction of Search, Plus Your World. Last week we explored the social media impact of Search, Plus Your World, in “Google Integrates Google+ in Search Results.” In this article, I’ll focus on the search-engine-optimization impact of this new feature.

Visibility in Search Results

The biggest impact SPYW has on SEO is the visual and personal nature of the results it returns. Compare these two search result sets for a very common search phrase: “shoes.”

Enlarge This Image

On the left is the typical Google search result set with a couple of high ranking brands, some local results and image results. On the right is my SPYW result set, made up entirely of what my circle of friends shared on Google+. It contains everything from a fabulously geeky post about modifying shoes with Android to a gleeful post about shopping for shoes to wear to a summer wedding.

The SPYW results are far more visually appealing, with the many images and mug shots of faces I’ll recognize because they’re in my Google+ Circles. It’s also much more entertaining than the straight result set because it’s full of opinions and some just weird stuff. So if I’m in the mood to be entertained and see what people I know think about a topic, SPYW is great.

But what if I want to buy shoes for my wedding in four months? This SPYW result set is not in the least bit useful to me. Even if I narrow my search query to “ivory wedge wedding shoes,” the SPYW results are still not useful in my online purchase quest.

Enlarge This Image

It would be easy to jump to the conclusion that SPYW is not relevant to ecommerce SEO. But that would be a premise based on a couple of things that are specifically true about my interactions on Google+, which determines the deeply personalized results I’ll receive in SPYW. First, nearly all my Google+ friends are obsessed with SEO or Android or technology in general, not shoes. Second, I’ve not been able to coax most of my Facebook and Twitter friends over to Google+. The everyday girly interests we share are still occurring on Facebook rather than Google+. Third, I haven’t +1’d a single shoe brand. All of these factors — specific to my interactions in Google+ — limit Google’s SPYW usefulness in an ecommerce query for “shoes” or “ivory wedge wedding shoes.”

This dive into the minutia of my personal Google+ activity is meant to illustrate a larger point. Just as my Google+ activity is specific to the people I know, their willingness to join Google+, and their desire to share certain things and not other things on Google+, so is every other individual’s Google+ activity out there. This is personalization at the most individual level, and represents a completely different SPYW experience for each of those people.

Ecommerce Sites Can Benefit from SPYW

So how does an ecommerce site take advantage of the SPYW opportunity for more visibility in search results? Contributor Paul Chaney got the ball rolling in his article last week with the following action items.

• If you don’t already have a Google+ business page, set one up. Paul’s previous article on the topic, “How to Create a Google+ Business Page,” should help.
• Share content with Google+ regularly. Zappos’ Google+ page is a good model to follow. The company shares product images with links to the online catalog, videos, status updates, news about issues related to the company, and even personal anecdotes.
• Build your network. It does no good to post content if you don’t have a group of followers to share it with. One way to do this is by adding a Google+ badge to your website that links to your Google+ page. In addition, add the +1 button to product pages, which enables people to recommend your products and services. Once people add your page to their Circles, add them back.

These are great tips. To these I’ll add a fourth step: Make it easy for fans to +1 content on your ecommerce site. I wrote about this previously, in “Using Social Buttons to Enhance Search Engine Optimization.”

Paul is right. Zappos does do an excellent job populating its Google+ stream with content. It even has some fan comments, re-shares and +1s of its posts, each of which shares the content to a wider audience on Google+ and in search results. But on the Zappos site itself, there’s no mention of its Google+ account, no buttons to +1 Zappos.com, and no buttons at the product level to +1 or share to Google+. You can email, Facebook or tweet any product you choose, but Zappos hasn’t yet made it easy to +1 and share to Google+. The same goes for Shoes.com, another major ecommerce shoe site with a strong Google+ page but poor onsite integration with Google+.

Summary

Remember, arming an ecommerce site with sharing buttons is like partially outsourcing social media and SEO success to consumers. A marketing team can only share so much content on its own, and that content tends to sound like, well, marketing. But empowering consumers to share content in their languages with their enthusiasm goes a lot farther both in terms of the sheer numbers of sharing posts and the power of that person’s endorsement with their friends and potentially their friends’ friends on Google+. It now affects Google’s Search, Plus Your World results.

Read More

• Google’s +1 Expansion Boosts Search and Social
• Using Social Buttons to Enhance Search Engine Optimization
• Managing SEO and Social Media Together

http://www.practicalecommerce.com/articles/3339-SEO-Impact-of-Google-s-Search-Plus-Your-World

As search and social become ever more entwined in Google’s and Bing’s algorithms and search results, search engine optimizers cannot afford to turn a blind eye to social media. Bing incorporates Facebook data into its search results. Google has taken another big step with the introduction of Search, Plus Your World. Last week we explored the social media impact of Search, Plus Your World, in “Google Integrates Google+ in Search Results.” In this article, I’ll focus on the search-engine-optimization impact of this new feature.

Visibility in Search Results

The biggest impact SPYW has on SEO is the visual and personal nature of the results it returns. Compare these two search result sets for a very common search phrase: “shoes.”

Enlarge This Image

On the left is the typical Google search result set with a couple of high ranking brands, some local results and image results. On the right is my SPYW result set, made up entirely of what my circle of friends shared on Google+. It contains everything from a fabulously geeky post about modifying shoes with Android to a gleeful post about shopping for shoes to wear to a summer wedding.

The SPYW results are far more visually appealing, with the many images and mug shots of faces I’ll recognize because they’re in my Google+ Circles. It’s also much more entertaining than the straight result set because it’s full of opinions and some just weird stuff. So if I’m in the mood to be entertained and see what people I know think about a topic, SPYW is great.

But what if I want to buy shoes for my wedding in four months? This SPYW result set is not in the least bit useful to me. Even if I narrow my search query to “ivory wedge wedding shoes,” the SPYW results are still not useful in my online purchase quest.

Enlarge This Image

It would be easy to jump to the conclusion that SPYW is not relevant to ecommerce SEO. But that would be a premise based on a couple of things that are specifically true about my interactions on Google+, which determines the deeply personalized results I’ll receive in SPYW. First, nearly all my Google+ friends are obsessed with SEO or Android or technology in general, not shoes. Second, I’ve not been able to coax most of my Facebook and Twitter friends over to Google+. The everyday girly interests we share are still occurring on Facebook rather than Google+. Third, I haven’t +1’d a single shoe brand. All of these factors — specific to my interactions in Google+ — limit Google’s SPYW usefulness in an ecommerce query for “shoes” or “ivory wedge wedding shoes.”

This dive into the minutia of my personal Google+ activity is meant to illustrate a larger point. Just as my Google+ activity is specific to the people I know, their willingness to join Google+, and their desire to share certain things and not other things on Google+, so is every other individual’s Google+ activity out there. This is personalization at the most individual level, and represents a completely different SPYW experience for each of those people.

Ecommerce Sites Can Benefit from SPYW

So how does an ecommerce site take advantage of the SPYW opportunity for more visibility in search results? Contributor Paul Chaney got the ball rolling in his article last week with the following action items.

• If you don’t already have a Google+ business page, set one up. Paul’s previous article on the topic, “How to Create a Google+ Business Page,” should help.
• Share content with Google+ regularly. Zappos’ Google+ page is a good model to follow. The company shares product images with links to the online catalog, videos, status updates, news about issues related to the company, and even personal anecdotes.
• Build your network. It does no good to post content if you don’t have a group of followers to share it with. One way to do this is by adding a Google+ badge to your website that links to your Google+ page. In addition, add the +1 button to product pages, which enables people to recommend your products and services. Once people add your page to their Circles, add them back.

These are great tips. To these I’ll add a fourth step: Make it easy for fans to +1 content on your ecommerce site. I wrote about this previously, in “Using Social Buttons to Enhance Search Engine Optimization.”

Paul is right. Zappos does do an excellent job populating its Google+ stream with content. It even has some fan comments, re-shares and +1s of its posts, each of which shares the content to a wider audience on Google+ and in search results. But on the Zappos site itself, there’s no mention of its Google+ account, no buttons to +1 Zappos.com, and no buttons at the product level to +1 or share to Google+. You can email, Facebook or tweet any product you choose, but Zappos hasn’t yet made it easy to +1 and share to Google+. The same goes for Shoes.com, another major ecommerce shoe site with a strong Google+ page but poor onsite integration with Google+.

Summary

Remember, arming an ecommerce site with sharing buttons is like partially outsourcing social media and SEO success to consumers. A marketing team can only share so much content on its own, and that content tends to sound like, well, marketing. But empowering consumers to share content in their languages with their enthusiasm goes a lot farther both in terms of the sheer numbers of sharing posts and the power of that person’s endorsement with their friends and potentially their friends’ friends on Google+. It now affects Google’s Search, Plus Your World results.

Read More

• Google’s +1 Expansion Boosts Search and Social
• Using Social Buttons to Enhance Search Engine Optimization
• Managing SEO and Social Media Together

http://www.practicalecommerce.com/articles/3339-SEO-Impact-of-Google-s-Search-Plus-Your-World

As search and social become ever more entwined in Google’s and Bing’s algorithms and search results, search engine optimizers cannot afford to turn a blind eye to social media. Bing incorporates Facebook data into its search results. Google has taken another big step with the introduction of Search, Plus Your World. Last week we explored the social media impact of Search, Plus Your World, in “Google Integrates Google+ in Search Results.” In this article, I’ll focus on the search-engine-optimization impact of this new feature.

Visibility in Search Results

The biggest impact SPYW has on SEO is the visual and personal nature of the results it returns. Compare these two search result sets for a very common search phrase: “shoes.”

Enlarge This Image

On the left is the typical Google search result set with a couple of high ranking brands, some local results and image results. On the right is my SPYW result set, made up entirely of what my circle of friends shared on Google+. It contains everything from a fabulously geeky post about modifying shoes with Android to a gleeful post about shopping for shoes to wear to a summer wedding.

The SPYW results are far more visually appealing, with the many images and mug shots of faces I’ll recognize because they’re in my Google+ Circles. It’s also much more entertaining than the straight result set because it’s full of opinions and some just weird stuff. So if I’m in the mood to be entertained and see what people I know think about a topic, SPYW is great.

But what if I want to buy shoes for my wedding in four months? This SPYW result set is not in the least bit useful to me. Even if I narrow my search query to “ivory wedge wedding shoes,” the SPYW results are still not useful in my online purchase quest.

Enlarge This Image

It would be easy to jump to the conclusion that SPYW is not relevant to ecommerce SEO. But that would be a premise based on a couple of things that are specifically true about my interactions on Google+, which determines the deeply personalized results I’ll receive in SPYW. First, nearly all my Google+ friends are obsessed with SEO or Android or technology in general, not shoes. Second, I’ve not been able to coax most of my Facebook and Twitter friends over to Google+. The everyday girly interests we share are still occurring on Facebook rather than Google+. Third, I haven’t +1’d a single shoe brand. All of these factors — specific to my interactions in Google+ — limit Google’s SPYW usefulness in an ecommerce query for “shoes” or “ivory wedge wedding shoes.”

This dive into the minutia of my personal Google+ activity is meant to illustrate a larger point. Just as my Google+ activity is specific to the people I know, their willingness to join Google+, and their desire to share certain things and not other things on Google+, so is every other individual’s Google+ activity out there. This is personalization at the most individual level, and represents a completely different SPYW experience for each of those people.

Ecommerce Sites Can Benefit from SPYW

So how does an ecommerce site take advantage of the SPYW opportunity for more visibility in search results? Contributor Paul Chaney got the ball rolling in his article last week with the following action items.

• If you don’t already have a Google+ business page, set one up. Paul’s previous article on the topic, “How to Create a Google+ Business Page,” should help.
• Share content with Google+ regularly. Zappos’ Google+ page is a good model to follow. The company shares product images with links to the online catalog, videos, status updates, news about issues related to the company, and even personal anecdotes.
• Build your network. It does no good to post content if you don’t have a group of followers to share it with. One way to do this is by adding a Google+ badge to your website that links to your Google+ page. In addition, add the +1 button to product pages, which enables people to recommend your products and services. Once people add your page to their Circles, add them back.

These are great tips. To these I’ll add a fourth step: Make it easy for fans to +1 content on your ecommerce site. I wrote about this previously, in “Using Social Buttons to Enhance Search Engine Optimization.”

Paul is right. Zappos does do an excellent job populating its Google+ stream with content. It even has some fan comments, re-shares and +1s of its posts, each of which shares the content to a wider audience on Google+ and in search results. But on the Zappos site itself, there’s no mention of its Google+ account, no buttons to +1 Zappos.com, and no buttons at the product level to +1 or share to Google+. You can email, Facebook or tweet any product you choose, but Zappos hasn’t yet made it easy to +1 and share to Google+. The same goes for Shoes.com, another major ecommerce shoe site with a strong Google+ page but poor onsite integration with Google+.

Summary

Remember, arming an ecommerce site with sharing buttons is like partially outsourcing social media and SEO success to consumers. A marketing team can only share so much content on its own, and that content tends to sound like, well, marketing. But empowering consumers to share content in their languages with their enthusiasm goes a lot farther both in terms of the sheer numbers of sharing posts and the power of that person’s endorsement with their friends and potentially their friends’ friends on Google+. It now affects Google’s Search, Plus Your World results.

Read More

• Google’s +1 Expansion Boosts Search and Social
• Using Social Buttons to Enhance Search Engine Optimization
• Managing SEO and Social Media Together

SFGate
February 2, 2012 04:00 AM
Copyright SFGate. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Thursday, February 2, 2012

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/g/a/2012/02/02/prweb9162525.DTL

News Editor

Email | Web

http://www.sbwire.com/press-releases/seo-link-monster-google-ranking-booster-all-set-for-highly-anticipated-launch-125151.htm

ShareThis



Email


PDF


Print

Quick SEO Results Offers Free 30 Day Trials

“We’ve been in this industry for relatively a short time, but we have managed to climb very quickly to match the industry’s standards.” — Jonathan Kennedy

Cebu, CEB (PRWEB) January 31, 2012

Canadian based SEO service provider, Quick SEO Results announces their latest service updates to the public. Quick SEO Results is in the industry of providing its users the best user experience to improve rankings on Search Engine Results Page (SERP) and to draw organic traffic to websites. Today, they partner with notable client Orthofill to become the leading supplier to fix teeth gaps. In addition to this new partnership, Quick SEO Results opened their doors to the public for agencies and resellers to boost search engine marketing.

The company has taken this big step because they are confident about their services and that they have the capability to make Orthofill a leading provider in its industry. “We’ve been in this industry for relatively a short time, but we have managed to climb very quickly to match the industry’s standards. Our methodology is built on 100% linkbuilding practices and is search engine approved. But what makes us different is that we believe SEO is a two-way relationship with our customers, without this crucial level of commitment and participation, a SEO campaign is bound to fail” mentions Business Development – Managing Director, Jonathan Kennedy.

The team at Quick SEO Results brought Orthofill’s traffic of 5,000 hits/month to 19,000 hits/month within the first 6 months. The company was able to garner the much needed traffic (through their suggested keywords) to double Orthofill’s revenue and drop PPC campaigns.

“Given the great progress and positive feedback we’ve been getting the past year, we’re open to getting more partners to work with for our future endeavors. We’ve been contacted by big companies such as Domino’s and we’re super excited for that to push through!” says Managing Director, JP Bisson. Interested parties can contact Quick SEO Results directly or merely by visiting their website landing page and clicking the ‘Agencies and Resellers’ tab. Pricing and other valuable information such as volume discounts will be provided upon inquiry.

Quick SEO Results offers a 30 day free SEO trial to its potential clients. This Canadian SEO company troubleshoots websites with limited and unused resources to target their audience and maximize potential revenue. From enhancing keywords to garnering organic traffic, Quick SEO Results promises to deliver. For more information on its packages and pricing, visit their website at http://www.quickseoresults.com.

About

Quick SEO Results is a wholly owned company by Clicking Labs. With dedication and perseverance, they were able to bring together a team of multi-talented individuals to provide the world with creative and interesting marketing strategies to drive success to its clients. It was founded in Ontario, Canada but recently moved operations to Cebu, Philippines in early 2011.

###

Share:

http://www.prweb.com/releases/2012/1/prweb9143995.htm